Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:53:32 +0100 (BST) From: Mark Valentine <mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk> To: fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner), wollman@lcs.mit.edu Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Who broke sort(1) ? Message-ID: <200209242253.g8OMrW4V081506@dotar.thuvia.org> In-Reply-To: <mailpost.1032902036.79152@thuvia.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) > Date: Tue 24 Sep, 2002 > Subject: Re: Who broke sort(1) ? > When's the first time the FreeBSD sort(1) man page mentioned that this > syntax was deprecated? Can we at least start from there? I echo this sentiment. Ideally, two 4.x releases would document something as deprecated before it actually broke in 5.0 (but preferably it still wouldn't break by default). Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs <mark@thuvia.co.uk> <http://www.thuvia.co.uk>; "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We're kind of stupid that way." *munch* *munch* and endorses FreeBSD -- <http://www.calvinandhobbes.com>; <http://www.freebsd.org>; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209242253.g8OMrW4V081506>