From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Dec 17 16:38:52 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA10965
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 16:38:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA10960
          Sun, 17 Dec 1995 16:38:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id QAA04853; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 16:38:48 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id QAA01438; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 16:39:27 -0800
Message-Id: <199512180039.QAA01438@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
cc: current@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD-current-stable ??? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 17 Dec 95 15:27:17 PST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.951217152225.6817A-100000@haven.uniserve.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 16:39:26 -0800
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>  While this discussion about -current is all very nice, but what I want 
>to know, is anyone still doing bug-hunting through the -stable tree?

   Yes, fixes are going into -stable *slowly* (just as they should be).

-DG