Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:05:16 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>, FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: termcap under single luser Message-ID: <863all40c3.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4896C3FF.50104@psg.com> (Randy Bush's message of "Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:55:27 %2B0900") References: <4896818D.5040904@psg.com> <4896C372.5050109@andric.com> <4896C3FF.50104@psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> writes: > Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 2008-08-04 06:11, Randy Bush wrote: > > > if i boot single luser, /rescue/(vi|ed) etc barf because > > > > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 23 Oct 11 2007 /etc/termcap@ -> > > > /usr/share/misc/termcap > > > > > > is not mounted. > > Mount /usr ? :) > wanna guess why i am running single luser? 'mount -t /usr' works, it's what I usually do. However, we're long past the point where conserving space on / justifies the inconvenience of having termcap on /usr. Plus, there's not much point in having vi in /rescue if you can't use it anyway, is there? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?863all40c3.fsf>