From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 1 12:02:39 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B38515D8862 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hruodr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DCD473451 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:02:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hruodr@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id z23so15630805wma.4 for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:02:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=mdrICwP4MPUpnVfD5SbGAYTeWIXjkNPiZCmRE60u+YI=; b=uUNp7vaJ6vb1tgvjaH1bHC62/LnuW2HYZxA7oagZScADmqKi3Y8Nh/QJojEnlv+PnN 8LjhnMph6C3XkM1YDXLB9roLax/x/tzhlxtCUT38SMqGCDIKlS3yt3XwGf/kHmlR/iMY DBbM6ZFjysqmCKkPGcCuvVk6ZE2reey1bH4rucBeLq/5E50Iqr5+04aiMcYST1fl5e7P sZN5RQW9aRtOIuKhGiHwvtmsF8OsIilER5BrjUlvcIrLpcWI4b+SlpBKb4XCmELjvHjL 17KvEID6CJuNkSyain3MnVIvzLDaCCAd38egBE+r67V0apmk2BpxCGNH62i7VgEUjnHY qOhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=mdrICwP4MPUpnVfD5SbGAYTeWIXjkNPiZCmRE60u+YI=; b=hsrFEMuojZk1Nw0m6bg878fE/lRh9l68r+/gecR2fcSkV27QWBQh+OhzcBriLEkXLv DYenoyEX8XTjzQFMp4TaxBEPADKzXCLNmlDVB4tx5AUOhAK81c15AL9cwY6qU1NjCygx 8XJHv2dq6np6x4xBjF2IIZhGgFOaSN+y+uC3kOOwU+mSB0fquQcsyhxTSlAs6SmtNdrj ZYCU0oYM6fSgEfAGmLyHHPNVGYtWcUVQJ26SLqiVQWUSjg4np5baieUpInMLZFnnXDRD YtvQsAvJFnQpWvbu4gY5/J8K2w0zQyvuvGjS0LUk6mZdrgfnxC/D4tTXGdagyGCqk4YB Iyww== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUyeX1p/qbMk6u4KYp8A17rGTrGKEAlKebLIhhLqm4uTrACNwqT BrSCcnAkn+8CZ7OCjKnp2UU9lvDgTd8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzeM1M6dw0yiG1iVLDsR8YfsdpnmfNuGHJYZLSPYN/mU1aIN7WwY5lF2z4WHLBoylS187Uidg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc09:: with SMTP id f9mr17818202wmh.68.1561982556624; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.43] ([88.130.159.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n2sm6365757wmi.38.2019.07.01.05.02.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:02:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Roderick To: Peter Boosten cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20190630092535.7913d305.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8DCD473451 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=uUNp7vaJ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hruodr@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::333 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hruodr@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.78 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.984,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.78)[ip: (-8.92), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.60), asn: 15169(-2.34), country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 12:02:39 -0000 On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Peter Boosten via freebsd-questions wrote: > _and_ that sendmail is based on a single executable, while other MTAs > spread the tasks over several. Is that really so bad? Why people do not hammer exim, the standard MTA in debian, for the same reason? Does it have advantages that neutralizes it? I tried a little exim, a little postfix and used at the end sendmail. I googled to find differences in order to decide, but I did not find anything that helped much to take a decision. Rod.