From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 27 16:48:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F9A777 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:48:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kaduk@mit.edu) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-2.MIT.EDU [18.9.25.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E794D58 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:48:20 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 1209190d-b7fa66d0000008f6-4d-515321a2bc99 Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 71.F3.02294.2A123515; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:43:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id r2RGhDw3023400; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:43:14 -0400 Received: from multics.mit.edu (SYSTEM-LOW-SIPB.MIT.EDU [18.187.2.37]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id r2RGhBX3019833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:43:13 -0400 Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id r2RGhAO6014533; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:43:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:43:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk To: Velcro Leaf Subject: Re: filesystems don't properly dismount In-Reply-To: <1364380546.45116.YahooMailNeo@web164504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <1364380546.45116.YahooMailNeo@web164504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-559023410-1970454349-1364402590=:9389" X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmphleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT0V2kGBxo8HaapMWxxz/ZLH5e+sPi wOQx49N8Fo+Hu9pYApiiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDLWXmtkKrjJXbHy2Tq2BsYznF2MnBwSAiYS Vx62skLYYhIX7q1n62Lk4hAS2Mco8ePPAWYIZyOjxJ2Ha9ghnENMEn+Xf2AEaRESaGCUaO3k A7FZBLQl3kxayQRiswmoSMx8s5ENxBYBip9ZehWsnlnAVGLXgk/MILawgIHEulldYPWcAp4S l89fZAexeQUcJNY+/wUU5wCa7yEx8a4QSFhUQEdi9f4pLBAlghInZz5hgRgZINH0+SnzBEbB WUhSs5CkIGxriQ1vpzJB2NoS92+2sS1gZFnFKJuSW6Wbm5iZU5yarFucnJiXl1qka6SXm1mi l5pSuokRFNickrw7GN8dVDrEKMDBqMTD2yAeHCjEmlhWXJl7iFGSg0lJlHeSPFCILyk/pTIj sTgjvqg0J7X4EKMEB7OSCK+FKFCONyWxsiq1KB8mJc3BoiTOeyXlpr+QQHpiSWp2ampBahFM VoaDQ0mC10oBqFGwKDU9tSItM6cEIc3EwQkynAdoeDxIDW9xQWJucWY6RP4Uo6KUOK8ASEIA JJFRmgfXC0s8rxjFgV4R5o0CqeIBJi247ldAg5mABk/96w8yuCQRISXVwJgZ3+5iyZ2wWHfO jrccCy/2x7ZLLnHMXPlqt7WJHtvflJyHWz/YmSzS/pi7Z9aRkz4/zJl65y8/W8i50dDGXH2W rTb3tlK1xYJ9F9V03kRXr1wpqql2VnyecpTV/sty8kuOzfc8o2wmEvcnZnfM4X+7ayRLVkRf MMtpaV0c5PcyeedPHT4ndiWW4oxEQy3mouJEAHw/9twXAwAA Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:48:21 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---559023410-1970454349-1364402590=:9389 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Velcro Leaf wrote: > Somewhere between 9.0-RELEASE and 9.1-RELEASE, something changed that > makes it so filesystems on two of my servers with similar hardware don't = cleanly shut down during soft reboots. > > I only saw a couple > examples of successful rebooting on 9.0 while transitioning from an > earlier version to 9.1, but filesystems consistently complain during > boot-up that they were not dismounted properly during every reboot in > 9.1. > > Based on the release notes, it seems like it might have > something to do with the new style of NFS.=A0 Is the old style still > latent in 9.1?=A0 For example, can you recompile the kernel with differen= t > options to make the old style of NFS the default?=A0 Am I barking up the > wrong tree?=A0 Any suggestions? The default NFS implementation did not change between 9.0 and 9.1. Per the 9.0 release notes, you can change your kernel configuration to=20 control which implementation is used -- NFSCL/NFSD are the "new" versions,= =20 and NFSCLIENT/NFSSERVER are the old ones. Are you running GENERIC or a=20 custom configuration? -Ben Kaduk ---559023410-1970454349-1364402590=:9389--