Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 10:52:11 +0100 From: "Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> To: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: APM Patch - review Message-ID: <20040526105211.3b6667ac.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> In-Reply-To: <F760B14C9561B941B89469F59BA3A8470647F8A8@orsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <F760B14C9561B941B89469F59BA3A8470647F8A8@orsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 25 May 2004 15:43:55 -0700 "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com> wrote: > Valid values for remaining battery life are 0xFF, and 0-100. > > -1, 255 and 0xFF are the SAME when looking at an 8 bit value. Since this > 8 bit value was sign-extended to 32 bits to go into ai_batt_time, if it > was 0xFF, it is now 0xFFFFFFFF, and you will never see 0x000000FF. > > I will email you the APM spec privately (it's big). Please take a look > at page 42 especially. > > Regards -- Andy Ah I see. This would mean alot of the apm code in function print_all_info is not needed. Correct? That manual is great Andy! Thanks:)! >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040526105211.3b6667ac.liamfoy>