Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 07:39:13 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@pompo.net> To: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Second "RFC" on pkg-data idea for ports Message-ID: <20040419053913.GA47472@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <20040418191720.V40588@blues.jpj.net> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404171330130.26375-100000@pancho> <20040418191720.V40588@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le Lun 19 avr 04 à 2:24:03 +0200, Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> écrivait : > I don't know much about Pear at all, but would a ports/Mk/bsd.pear.mk to > replace ports/devel/pear-PEAR/Makefile.common be worthwhile? IIRC many > Pear ports in other categories can't even be fetched without having the > Makefile.common. This is an intesresting possibility, and I was recently speaking about that with Roman Neuhauser. But note that Makefile.common uses devel/pear-PEAR/pkg-deinstall and pkg-install (these two files could be merged). -- Th. Thomas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040419053913.GA47472>