Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:12:27 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Jason Helfman <jgh@FreeBSD.org>, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r315756 - in head/net: ntp ntp-devel ntp-rc Message-ID: <20130408081227.GC81897@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20130408073124.GA14697@FreeBSD.org> References: <201304080510.r385Axhj037385@svn.freebsd.org> <20130408063433.GA38357@hatter> <20130408070307.GB81897@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20130408073124.GA14697@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:31:24AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:03:07AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Yes conversion wasn't complete, this patch makes it completes so if cy@= is ok > > with it, you get the portmgr approval. >=20 > The question remains, however, how could the first (incomplete) patch went > through portmgr@... >=20 > ./danfe because the first patch also works (compatibility code in bsd.options.mk ma= kes sure of that) and preparing the release is quite a lot of activity so this = can happen, but actually nothing has been broken with this patch, and the resul= ted package will remain unchange, so not a big deal. Thank you Jason for having spotted this and proposed a fix. regards, Bapt --V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlFie+sACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExMlQCfcb/6XFlcdFeIAO6oNKqM5BXV vIEAnjlWQad7/TqE60By0lx1ejxVafai =YnOD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130408081227.GC81897>