Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 03:02:09 +0900 From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org> To: babolo@links.ru Cc: sada@FreeBSD.ORG, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, tom@eborcom.com, girgen@partitur.se, cjh@kr.freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Introducing a netscape wrapper Message-ID: <86k8ha19em.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Thu, 4 May 2000 20:27:29 %2B0400 (MSD)" <200005041627.UAA07604@aaz.links.ru> References: <86bt2nv26q.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> <200005041627.UAA07604@aaz.links.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Thu, 4 May 2000 20:27:29 +0400 (MSD),
Aleksandr A.Babaylov <babolo@links.ru> wrote:
> 3 is the Bad Thing IMHO
> look at ports/www/netscape-remote
Why does it matter? Each netscape port already has a wrapper and the
new one just takes its place as a meta-wrapper. All given command
line options will be passed through to the netscape binary.
Besides, I'd note that the netscape-remote is obsolete because
netscape 4.x itself has the `-remote' option, which the new wrapper
uses.
--
/
/__ __
/ ) ) ) ) /
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ idaemons.org / FreeBSD.org
"We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k8ha19em.wl>