From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 12 03:00:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE0D16A402 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 03:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAEC43D45 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 03:00:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3C30WH6093806 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 03:00:32 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3C30WoW093805; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 03:00:32 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 03:00:32 GMT Message-Id: <200604120300.k3C30WoW093805@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Xin LI Cc: Subject: Re: kern/95559: RELENG_6: write(2) fails with EPERM on TCP socket under certain situations X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Xin LI List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 03:00:33 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/95559; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Xin LI To: Max Laier Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, delphij@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/95559: RELENG_6: write(2) fails with EPERM on TCP socket under certain situations Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:56:58 +0800 --=-k7PJ7o9Ke1pEhowR+HFe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Max, =E5=9C=A8 2006-04-12=E4=B8=89=E7=9A=84 03:22 +0200=EF=BC=8CMax Laier=E5=86= =99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Can you please try to get rid of IPFW completely? IPFW does return EPERM= (aka=20 > IP_FW_DENY) and this might mean that tcp-reassembly just breaks a IPFW sa= nity=20 > check that is performed eventhough the ruleset accepts all. Thanks for the hints. Unfortunately, however, it appears that this does not help :-( Having the two rules still causes EPERM. Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ --=-k7PJ7o9Ke1pEhowR+HFe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=E8=BF=99=E6=98=AF=E4=BF=A1=E4=BB=B6=E7=9A=84=E6=95=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AD=97=E7=AD=BE=E5=90=8D=E9=83=A8=E5=88=86?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEPGx6hcUczkLqiksRArqBAKCsnCNNZaXG9DeNKJiGd5BPkpVPmQCgrwee Nv9E3B1WZJqKDKz8WqH0BkI= =MW66 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-k7PJ7o9Ke1pEhowR+HFe--