From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 24 22:35:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC7E16A4CF for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:35:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE8143D5F for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:35:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAOMXU4V025256; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:33:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)iAOMXUgs025253; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:33:30 GMT (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:33:30 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Emanuel Haupt In-Reply-To: <20041124184342.04f0ac32.eh-lists-freebsd@critical.ch> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: merge nwfs code to 5-STABLE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:35:21 -0000 On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > nwfs works again on one of my 6.0-CURRENT test boxes. this is also > mentioned in german release notes (1). i was wondering if there are > plans to merge that code with 5-STABLE or maybe in 5.4-RELEASE?=20 >=20 > thank you, emanuel A quick diff didn't suggest to me that there were substantial changes in either the netncp code or nwfs code between RELENG_5 and HEAD that look like they are related: i.e., there are a few tweaks but they're all part of Poul Henning's buffer cache work. Do you have any more details on the nature of the change? I'd be happy to MFC stuff, but it's not immediately clear to me what to merge. My hope is to keep the network stack pieces of the kernel relatively in synch between RELENG_5 and HEAD as much as possible without breaking the ABI. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research >=20 > (1) > http://www.freebsd.org/de/relnotes/CURRENT/relnotes/i386/article.html > (sorry, i didn't find the corresponding article in english) >=20 > > NETNCP und die Unterst=FCtzung f=FCr Netware Dateisysteme (nwfs) > > funktionieren wieder. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >=20