From owner-freebsd-hubs Thu Feb 3 7:52:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4853ECB for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 07:52:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA13242 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 07:52:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id HAA90885; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 07:52:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 07:52:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200002031552.HAA90885@vashon.polstra.com> To: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup.internat.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200002030822.JAA23542@queeg.ludd.luth.se> References: <200002030822.JAA23542@queeg.ludd.luth.se> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Sender: owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article <200002030822.JAA23542@queeg.ludd.luth.se>, Mattias Pantzare wrote: > > > Is cvsup.internat.freebsd.org kept updated? > > > > Don't compare the version numbers -- they often don't match. What > > is on internat is not a direct copy of the US crypto code. That > > would (at least until recently) be illegal. Compare the log > > messages instead. > > That is wrong to, the internat version lacks IPv6 support. Er, which statement is "wrong"? 1. Don't compare the version numbers -- they often don't match. TRUE. 2. What is on internat is not a direct copy of the US crypto code. TRUE. 3. That would (at least until recently) be illegal. TRUE. 4. Compare the log messages instead. Good advice because of #1. > I suppose that this is done by hand then, and that one often will be > behind the other. Correct, but I never said otherwise. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message