From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Jun 6 03:23:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02673340673 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 03:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49f4bp68jNz4dq8 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 03:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D3521340672; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 03:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31A13409DD for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 03:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49f4bp5G4mz4dKh for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 03:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFF091B837 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 03:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0563NYlg021763 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 03:23:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0563NYQt021746 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 03:23:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246940] [wishlist/enhancement, patch incl.]: idle user tasks should be charged as "nice" or "idle" CPU time Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 03:23:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: t.eichstaedt@gmx.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 03:23:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246940 t.eichstaedt@gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #215241|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #11 from t.eichstaedt@gmx.net --- Created attachment 215284 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D215284&action= =3Dedit expose add. cp_time(s) (realtime/user_idle) via new sysctl cp_time(s)_ext I feel ashamed that I did not sent you the identical patch that I ran successfully. My editor (kate) included a BOM that I discovered when I was checking the patch visually, so I applied "recode(1)" to remove that. But recode(1) mangled a character in sys/sys/pcpu.h that I missed to discover. = I apologize for any inconvenience. Now this is the very same same patch that is running on my machine while I'm writing this, and it has the fixes applied that I mentioned in the previous posts. Should I install the FBSD-13 src tree and weave it in there, too? With kind regards, Torsten --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=