From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Mar 24 13:14:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ohm.physics.purdue.edu (ohm.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.146.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C0B37B71B for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 13:14:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@physics.purdue.edu) Received: (from will@localhost) by ohm.physics.purdue.edu (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2OLJ6S17443; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:19:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from will@physics.purdue.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: ohm.physics.purdue.edu: will set sender to will@physics.purdue.edu using -f Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:19:06 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Dennis Cc: Will Andrews , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Message-ID: <20010324161906.M5821@ohm.physics.purdue.edu> Reply-To: Will Andrews References: <5.0.0.25.0.20010324150424.03bc3900@mail.etinc.com> <5.0.0.25.0.20010324142928.03a8b9d0@mail.etinc.com> <200103241731.SAA49447@info.iet.unipi.it> <5.0.0.25.0.20010324142928.03a8b9d0@mail.etinc.com> <20010324144844.K5821@ohm.physics.purdue.edu> <5.0.0.25.0.20010324150424.03bc3900@mail.etinc.com> <20010324151237.L5821@ohm.physics.purdue.edu> <5.0.0.25.0.20010324155127.03daa8a0@mail.etinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hMSfLvDvQX5ATYp5" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20010324155127.03daa8a0@mail.etinc.com>; from dennis@etinc.com on Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 04:12:34PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --hMSfLvDvQX5ATYp5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 04:12:34PM -0500, Dennis wrote: > For your info, Bub, what makes the BSD license attractive is its usabilit= y=20 > by commercial vendors, so maybe you should go play in Linuxland because= =20 > you are the one in the wrong camp, not me. the ability to take code, fix = it=20 > and incorporate it into a product WITHOUT giving back source is the ENTIR= E=20 > CONCEPT of the BSD license. Obviously so, but it serves no point to complain about an opensource driver's problem on an opensource list if you're going to fix it in your proprietary tree, say you did so, and not pass it on. Since nobody else gets to see your "fix", it won't solve a thing, for you or FreeBSD. > And why does all of your email have that stupid attachment? Whats the=20 > matter, cant figure out how to use an open-source mailer? :-) What's the matter, don't know how to use pgp? --=20 wca --hMSfLvDvQX5ATYp5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6vQ9KF47idPgWcsURApdiAJ49R3g7v4cPvKocXmkYVmFAOPFCZgCeIwzq 013ioDy4bFk7jV5dSwpgFLE= =D0WJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hMSfLvDvQX5ATYp5-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message