From owner-freebsd-chat  Mon Nov 17 14:15:18 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA19843
          for chat-outgoing; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 14:15:18 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat)
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA19815
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 14:15:00 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA08418;
	Mon, 17 Nov 1997 22:14:47 GMT
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id XAA08760;
	Mon, 17 Nov 1997 23:14:46 +0100 (MET)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 23:14:46 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199711172214.XAA08760@bitbox.follo.net>
From: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
CC: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Julian Elischer's message of Mon, 17 Nov 1997 11:41:22 -0800
Subject: Re: FreeBSD based box wins prize at COMDEX!
References: <34709DE2.ABD322C@whistle.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Of course we're thrilled at Whsitle, but I think the FreeBSD
> Community as a whole should take a little bow and pat itself on the
> back, for producing such a great base from which we could work!

Congratulations to you (and everybody else)!

>  Great work..
> keep it up. We're doing what we can to make sure it's not a one-way
> flow..

And you're doing a good job at it.

> (unlike some of our competitors I might add (you listenning iplanet,
> freegate, gnatbox?))

Contributing back is hard work, and it is (I expect) much easier to do
with your own personal FreeBSD developer.  Personally, I have a lot of
patches sitting around in our tree that I just haven't got around to
sending anywhere else yet :-(

> julian
> 
> p.s We're a bit annoyed that NT even got mentionned in OUR award..
> grrrrr
> (seems that any IP based network is now called an 'NT network' in
> some circles.. (Microsoft invented IP didn't it? )

At least in Windows 95/NT, it is marked as a 'Microsoft' protocol.

Eivind.