From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Apr 18 17:03:52 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA18199
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 17:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA18191
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 17:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	  by palmer.demon.co.uk (sendmail/PALMER-1) with SMTP id BAA01908
	  ; Fri, 19 Apr 1996 01:03:13 +0100 (BST)
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>
cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: NFS and NIS between two 2.1-STABLE machines 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 Apr 1996 16:38:35 EDT."
             <Pine.NEB.3.93.960418163724.6921L-100000@freebsd.ki.net> 
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 01:03:13 +0100
Message-ID: <1906.829872193@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

"Marc G. Fournier" wrote in message ID
<Pine.NEB.3.93.960418163724.6921L-100000@freebsd.ki.net>:
> 	Wonder if MH is going to support IMAP4?  Of course all "new"
> protocols state it, but IMAP4 is supposed to be the "be all and end
> all" of mail protocols, merging POP and IMAP features into one spec...

No idea. I dunno if it's even being developed anymore ... MH 6.8.3 has
been out for an awful long time...

Gary