From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 24 21:35:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCBBF122 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94592D3B for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCWO-0007DE-48 for freebsd-xen@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:35:04 +0100 Received: from 77.202.37.188.rev.vodafone.pt ([188.37.202.77]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:35:04 +0100 Received: from miguelmclara by 77.202.37.188.rev.vodafone.pt with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:35:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org From: Miguel Clara Subject: Re: Panic with FreeBSD 10 RC2 on Netbsd Xen dom0 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <20131218001615.GA10501@moore.morphism.de> <52B24E18.7090109@gmail.com> <52B2AC26.2020301@citrix.com> <52CBB8D3.8090508@citrix.com> <6153b6b3-8ea9-4dc8-b039-7ab678e33b5e@email.android.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 188.37.202.77 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.152 Safari/537.36) X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:35:16 -0000 Hi, sorry for the wait. I was looking into this this days... I'm considering changing the dom0, NetBSD has been stable for be, but I'm interested in having fetures like PCI PASSTROUGH work, which they don't at the moment. But even so I tried the propose r251297 and this one fails, and I believe this is the one o re-introduced the problem, I see this: --> #define NF_TSO_MAXBURST NetBSD doesn't support TSO, so it comes back to an would similar issue in FreeBSD 9, and I had a similar issue with Windows drivers, trying to use TSO... the dev also had to fix it... I understand those "pathces" are Linux Dom0 related.... I guess something dev's forget NETBSD is still there.... :P Anyway I'm not a dev so I could just be assuming stuff, but all I can tell is that with that release I still have the problem.