From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Nov  4 13:29:57 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA05834
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 13:29:57 -0800
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA05801
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 13:29:53 -0800
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA10307; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 14:27:04 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199511042127.OAA10307@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Hmmmm!  `resvport' keyword not documented *anywhere*?
To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett A. Wollman)
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 1995 14:27:04 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <9511041645.AA07261@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett A. Wollman" at Nov 4, 95 11:45:26 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 467       
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > And the mount_nfs man page does not describe how to put FS specific
> > mount options into the fstab.  8-(.
> 
> The same way as you would on the `mount' command line, with the
> exception that `ro' or `rw' must come first.

You mean as dash options.

This begs the question of "why have undocumented word options at all?".


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.