From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 18 12:53:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF0616A403; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D2B43CA7; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:53:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (yar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBICqmw3004357; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:52:48 GMT (envelope-from yar@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from yar@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id kBICqmGj004353; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:52:48 GMT (envelope-from yar) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:52:48 GMT From: Yar Tikhiy Message-Id: <200612181252.kBICqmGj004353@freefall.freebsd.org> To: yar@FreeBSD.org, yar@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/106116: [PATCH] wrong definition of kilobit per second in systat(1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:53:10 -0000 Synopsis: [PATCH] wrong definition of kilobit per second in systat(1) Responsible-Changed-From-To: yar->freebsd-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: yar Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Dec 18 12:45:30 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'm an old fart who thinks that decimal prefixes are evil. Well, I'm not old enough to really insist on sticking to binary prefixes for bits regardless of the standard; but mixing decimal and binary prefixes in one systat(1) display still is no good IMHO. That's why I'm not going to deal with this PR. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=106116