From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 15 19:01:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA28740 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 19:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalypso.iqm.unicamp.br (kalypso.iqm.unicamp.br [143.106.13.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA28731 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 19:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from vazquez@localhost) by kalypso.iqm.unicamp.br (8.8.5/8.7.3/FreeBSD/2.1.5) id XAA06174; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 23:01:04 -0300 (EST) From: Pedro A M Vazquez Message-Id: <199704160201.XAA06174@kalypso.iqm.unicamp.br> Subject: Re: Another Linux Religious war (was Re: Commercial vendors registry) To: ahobson@eng.mindspring.net (Andrew Hobson) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 23:01:04 -0300 (EST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Andrew Hobson" at Apr 15, 97 02:05:51 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Andrew Hobson said: > On Tue, 15 Apr 1997 23:30:17 +1000 (EST), Darren Reed said: > > I can't see any upper management person ever taking a liking to anything > > that is available "freely" on the 'net for mission critical stuff. And > > I don't mean your < 100 people small companies, but big organisations > > with real budgets. > > The DNS servers with the eighth largest number of domains (excluding > the root servers) are FreeBSD machines. > Well, we have a 2.1.7~stable box serving > 14k domains, in this case the whole .BR domain, it is a 16M P100 and it does lots of other things. The uptime is rulled by the no-breaks I can't say the same about the other .BR servers. Just another point in the curve. Pedro