From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Mar 30 23:20: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from nocnoc.mcnet.ch (nocnoc.mcnet.ch [193.5.166.251]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C81153A3 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 23:19:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Benoit.Rossier@mcnet.ch) Received: from pc15.mcnet.ch (pc15.mcnet.ch [193.5.166.35]) by nocnoc.mcnet.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA90738 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 09:21:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19990331091936.00bfaf60@nocnoc.mcnet.ch> X-Sender: brossier@nocnoc.mcnet.ch X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) [F] Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 09:19:36 +0200 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: Benoit Rossier Subject: IPFW performance impact? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, We want to implement IPFW on a server which has a traffic of 1 Mbits in full-duplex (1Mbps in AND 1Mbps out) on average. Can someone tell me the cpu overhead in percent generated by IPFW (we use PII 350)? TIA Ben To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message