From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 13:30:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2A31065677 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 13:30:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from claudiu.vasadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E8A8FC21 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 13:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lahl5 with SMTP id l5so5823326lah.13 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 05:30:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kY4FeoLYzNLa2IBqS+NYj8ff+d3XCsCx1pRgiNGzwmI=; b=ep/liLfbLNJEQ3hYPxpPvbiAnSlutJ6rSAPmh+iIhUByQ077LVBTyIvEk69xxrABIj PLMy3/S46wOlMsZzVaLYXieWgSREgCZAl5x98kNquHVx0jopCq7Ct6Z/cj5YGbCLmLoi GSG4ihhtOA04wAcDiGOIGQ1dPuxcVGGfyhjmw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.122.100 with SMTP id lr4mr2865092lab.47.1324818133741; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 05:02:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.20.202 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 05:02:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20111225102719.GA44906@tolstoy.tols.org> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 14:02:13 +0100 Message-ID: From: claudiu vasadi To: Johannes Totz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restoring received properties on a received filesystem. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 13:30:48 -0000 On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Johannes Totz wrote: Check out zfs receive -u, it doesn't mount the receiving filesystem. zpool > import -N doesn't mount your importing backup-pool. > > True, it doesn't, but upon reboot, since the received datasets keep their properties, they will be mounted (and this has the risk of potentially overwriting an exiting mountpoint). -- Best regards, Claudiu Vasadi