From owner-freebsd-security  Sat Jun 20 10:57:04 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA16581
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Sat, 20 Jun 1998 10:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from pubnix.org (www.pubnix.org [155.229.39.88])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA16574
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sat, 20 Jun 1998 10:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jtb@pubnix.org)
Received: from localhost (jtb@localhost)
	by pubnix.org (8.8.8/NooWop) with SMTP id NAA27512;
	Sat, 20 Jun 1998 13:56:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 1998 13:56:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: jtb <jtb@pubnix.org>
To: ben@rosengart.com
cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: non-executable stack?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980620135039.3890A-100000@echonyc.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980620135432.24819C-100000@pubnix.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

I'm very sorry, I seem to have misread his post, and I would like to
apologize.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Jonathan T. Bowie	ADM		w00w00		WSD
jobe@sekurity.org	jtb@pubnix.org		jobe@dataforce.net
Independant Security Developer
Home: (603)436-5698	"I'd hate to advocate drugs, sex, alcohol, or 
Cell: (603)553-6697       violence... to any one, but they've worked
                           for me."   -- Hunter S. Thompson
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


On Sat, 20 Jun 1998, Snob Art Genre wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Jun 1998, jtb wrote:
> 
> > It could just be me, but why are we discussing solaris 2.6 kernel options
> > on the FreeBSD security mailing list, if anyone wants to discuss teh
> > potential of instituting a similar patch in FreeBSD I'm all ears, but I
> > still don't see how discussing solaris kernel options has anything to do
> > with FreeBSD security.
> 
> The message to which you responded mentioned the Solaris option and
> discussed the possibility of implementing something similar in FreeBSD,
> and what the interface to use it should be.  It seem completely on topic
> to me, I don't understand your objection.
> 
> 
>  Ben
> 
> "You have your mind on computers, it seems." 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message