From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul  3 13:49:35 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3952106567F;
	Thu,  3 Jul 2008 13:49:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from watery.cc.kogakuin.ac.jp (watery.cc.kogakuin.ac.jp
	[133.80.152.80])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2FE8FC25;
	Thu,  3 Jul 2008 13:49:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by watery.cc.kogakuin.ac.jp (unknown) with ESMTP id m63DZxRK033411;
	Thu, 3 Jul 2008 22:35:59 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:34:53 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20080703.223453.104068461.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
To: ed@80386.nl
From: Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080702190901.GS14567@hoeg.nl>
References: <20080702190901.GS14567@hoeg.nl>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MPSAFE TTY schedule
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:49:35 -0000

In article <20080702190901.GS14567@hoeg.nl>
Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> writes:

> July 13 2008:
> 	Make uart(4) the default serial port driver, instead of sio(4).
> 	sio(4) has not been ported to the new TTY layer and is very hard
> 	to do so. uart(4) has been proven to be more portable than
> 	sio(4) and already supports the hardware we need.

uart(4) does not support PC98 CBus and i8251 devices at all.
So I wish that sio(4) is remained.

---
TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>