Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:40:13 -0500 From: Ryan Frederick <ryanrfrederick@gmail.com> To: marino@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] WITH_NEW_XORG is now the default on FreeBSD 10 and 9 stable Message-ID: <534FD9BD.3080202@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <534FD6DF.8020508@marino.st> References: <534ECCE7.7050204@freebsd.org> <1397695667853-5904246.post@n5.nabble.com> <1397739683132-5904376.post@n5.nabble.com> <534FD631.3090501@gmail.com> <534FD6DF.8020508@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/17/2014 08:27 AM, John Marino wrote: > On 4/17/2014 15:25, Ryan Frederick wrote: >> I think the updates may have broken INDEX. Running `pkg version -Ivl >> "<"` (or `pkg_version -Ivl "<"` on my non-pkgng systems) produces the >> following: >> >> libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7) >> libdrm-2.4.17_1 < needs updating (index has 2.4.52) >> >> ...despite both ports being up to date. >> > > Are you sure this isn't a NEW_XORG / OLD_XORG issue? > > John > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I don't believe so if you mean in terms of what's set in make.conf. I've never set WITH_NEW_XORG or WITHOUT_NEW_XORG in make.conf on any of my systems. I did follow the instructions in UPDATING for systems that had libGL and/or dri installed. Ryan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?534FD9BD.3080202>