From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Dec 23 21:56:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C56EA410C for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 21:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD2D77716 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 21:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 37DF2EA410B; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 21:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3789BEA410A for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 21:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (ipq210.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0510C77712; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 21:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503798E77; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 06:56:19 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-backdoor.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F395A32F1A; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 06:56:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B306D32F19; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 06:56:18 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 06:55:53 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20171224.065553.149647974919185417.yasu@utahime.org> To: jrm@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, ume@FreeBSD.org, dryice@dryice.name, dryice@FreeBSD.org, nobutaka@FreeBSD.org, joe@thrallingpenguin.com, kuriyama@FreeBSD.org, tz@FreeBSD.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Are these Emacs ports still useful? From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: <86d135nne8.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> References: <86d135nne8.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 23:26:07 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 21:56:28 -0000 From: Joseph Mingrone Subject: Are these Emacs ports still useful? Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400 > A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness. > Could you speak up if they are still useful or if you feel they should > be removed? (snip) > - editors/apel (2010 source) > - editors/flim (2007 source) > - editors/semi (2003 source) They are required by www/emacs-w3m. Regards. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA