From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu May  1 10:19:52 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA03765
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 1 May 1997 10:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA03759
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 1 May 1997 10:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA04240; Thu, 1 May 1997 10:16:44 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199705011716.KAA04240@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Unloading LKMs (was Re: A Desparate Plea for Help...)
To: black@zen.cypher.net (Ben Black)
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 10:16:44 -0700 (MST)
Cc: ccsanady@nyx.pr.mcs.net, dfr@nlsystems.com, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au,
        bde@zeta.org.au, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970430124137.32333A-100000@zen.cypher.net> from "Ben Black" at Apr 30, 97 12:41:50 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> welcome to solaris.
> 
> > How about a statically loaded version of the kernel?  I mean, will it now
> > be nothing more than an aggregate of some modules?  It would be nice if
> > all there were were modules, and to make yourself a kernel, you just
> > had to stick them together..

Which makes it no less nice for it being invented there first.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.