Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 01:09:30 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Guyomarch?= <rguyom@pobox.com> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem building smbfs module, any hint ? Message-ID: <20011110010930.B16577@diabolic-cow.chatgris.net> In-Reply-To: <200111091732.SAA28862@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com>; from helge.oldach@atosorigin.com on Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 06:32:26PM %2B0100 References: <20011101134912.A28557@netmonger.net> <200111091732.SAA28862@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 06:32:26PM +0100, Helge Oldach wrote: > Christopher Masto: > >On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 10:37:19AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > >> ok, thanks for the hint. > >> I still think there is a bug in the dependency then, because at > >> least from what i have seen when KLDfying other modules, > >> you make sure that your kernel contains all is needed > >> for later loading the module. > > > >smbfs is strange, partly a port, partly a kernel module, partly > >dependant on compiling the kernel with certain options (which seem to > >only be used for smbfs). > > Actually for 4.4-STABLE is is only a port, installing just smbutil. The > Makefile (or pkg-plist) is slightly broken: The kernel module should not > be deinstalled (it isn't installed by the port either). See ports/31635. > > To make it work one needs to add LIBMCHAIN *and* LIBICONV to a GENERIC > kernel config. Well, this does work for me... Minor point, but you only need LIBICONV in the kernel since libmchain is available as a module in 4.4-RELEASE (and thus in 4.4-STABLE too) : 8 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7876 7 oct 22:57 /modules/libmchain.ko* -- Rémi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011110010930.B16577>