From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 17 06:52:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA21538 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 06:52:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from siafu.iconnect.co.ke (upagraha.iconnect.co.ke [209.198.248.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA21527 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 06:52:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from me@anand.org) Received: from arb by siafu.iconnect.co.ke with local (Exim 2.05 #3) id 0zfmUG-0005aM-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 17:52:12 +0300 Message-ID: <19981117175212.O27036@iconnect.co.ke> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 17:52:12 +0300 From: Anand Buddhdev To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: using forwarders in named.boot Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm using the forwarders option in my named.boot file. I have 3 UUNET forwarders listed like this: forwarders 198.6.1.1 198.6.1.2 198.6.1.3 However, someone mentioned to me that it was a bad idea to have more than one forwarder. Is he right, and if yes, why so? I put the forwarders in to take advantage of UUNET's big caches. -- Anand To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message