From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 14:27:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C9216A403 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 14:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tonix@interazioni.it) Received: from mx02.interazioni.net (mx02.interazioni.net [80.94.114.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F3B13C458 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 14:27:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tonix@interazioni.it) Received: (qmail 35340 invoked by uid 88); 18 May 2007 14:00:45 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 35330, pid: 35334, t: 0.2013s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.88.7/m: Received: from unknown (HELO IATonino.interazioni.it) (tonix@interazioni.it@151.84.104.131) by relay.interazioni.net with ESMTPA; 18 May 2007 14:00:45 -0000 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:00:37 +0200 To: Nick Jagger ,freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, mdodd@freebsd.org From: "tonix (Antonio Nati)" In-Reply-To: <307487.67830.qm@web57515.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <307487.67830.qm@web57515.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-Id: <20070518142727.82F3B13C458@mx1.freebsd.org> Cc: Subject: Re: camcontrol and IDAD0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:27:28 -0000 Hello, I did try one year ago. Don't have the machine now available, but I remember it worked fine and rebuild all with the new parameter. Regards, Tonino At 15.07 18/05/2007, Nick Jagger wrote: >On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > > > Finally, these controllers seems to be unusable in a production > > > environment with FreeBSD. > > > >I don't think anyone has really tested rebuilding a volume while the > >system is running. > > > >I'd be interested in the results of changing the definition of IDA_QCB_MAX > >from 256 to 128. > > > >See sys/dev/ida/idavar.h: > > > > #define IDA_QCB_MAX 256 > > > >-- > >10 40 80 C0 00 FF FF FF FF C0 00 00 00 00 10 AA AA 03 00 00 00 08 00 > >============================================ > > > >Hi Matthew, > >One of my DL360's with smart array controller is hanging (and >resetting) about once a month with a similar error as reported by >Tonix. Do you recommend changing IDA_QCB_MAX to 128? > >Apparently the OP had good results with this change. Why is the >value still 256 in the current version of sys/dev/ida/idavar.h? > >What is the status of the ida patches (found in your ftp site)? > >Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >____________________________________________________________________________________ >8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time >with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. >http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news > > > > > > >____________________________________________________________________________________ >Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. >Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. >http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html