From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Mar 21 09:25:47 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA04383
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 09:25:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA04193
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 09:25:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) id MAA17267; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 12:30:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199603202030.MAA17267@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: PPP bonding ..
To: imb@scgt.oz.au (michael butler)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 12:30:46 -0800 (PST)
From: "JULIAN Elischer" <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Cc: lehey.pad@sni.de, jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199603201527.CAA29139@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> from "michael butler" at Mar 21, 96 02:27:45 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 ME8b]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I've seen sources to do bonded ppp.
I'm going to try get the author to contribute it back..


> 
> 
> Speaking of bonding .. what's needed to allow two modem-based PPP interfaces
> link to the same destination ? As far as I can tell ..
> 
[...]
> 
> Linux seems to have this capability .. do we want (need ?) to be compatible
> with them ?
> 
> 	michael
>