From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug  4 14:59:45 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A126816A4CE
	for <cvs-src@freebsd.org>; Wed,  4 Aug 2004 14:59:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from duchess.speedfactory.net (duchess.speedfactory.net
	[66.23.201.84])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2659243D31
	for <cvs-src@freebsd.org>; Wed,  4 Aug 2004 14:59:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ups@tree.com)
Received: (qmail 10569 invoked by uid 89); 4 Aug 2004 14:59:43 -0000
Received: from duchess.speedfactory.net (66.23.201.84)
  by duchess.speedfactory.net with SMTP; 4 Aug 2004 14:59:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 10391 invoked by uid 89); 4 Aug 2004 14:59:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO palm.tree.com) (66.23.216.49)
  by duchess.speedfactory.net with SMTP; 4 Aug 2004 14:59:40 -0000
Received: from palm.tree.com (localhost.tree.com [127.0.0.1])
	by palm.tree.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i74ExefY087845;
	Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:59:40 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from ups@palm.tree.com)
Message-Id: <200408041459.i74ExefY087845@palm.tree.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: "Mike Silbersack" <silby@silby.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from "Mike Silbersack" <silby@silby.com> 
	<23601.208.178.23.220.1091571858.squirrel@208.178.23.220> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:59:40 -0400
From: Stephan Uphoff <ups@tree.com>
cc: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org>
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
cc: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
cc: Stephan Uphoff <ups@tree.com>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm vm_map.c vm_map.h 
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 14:59:45 -0000


Mike Silbersack wrote:
> >> Good catch!  Unfortunately, the problems I was seeing above involved
> >> locks
> >> that didn't use upgrade or downgrade. :(
> >
> > Mhhh .. I found another bug (kern/69964).
> > Getting closer?  ;-)
> 
> I think that you should take the two bug reports, combine them, then merge
> them with a nasty letter criticising the entire 5 branch.  Title the
> message "FreeBSD locking fatally flawed."  If done well, it could become
> the new choice of slashdot trolls when they have to post something
> anti-FreeBSD. :)

Just recycling 10 year old articles about "Why Solaris 2.X will never be 
stable"
should be enough. ;-)

	Stephan