From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 18 21:49:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0210616A4CE for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:49:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from newman.ridge.aps.org (newman.ridge.aps.org [149.28.9.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FB943D1F for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:49:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@aps.org) Received: from [149.28.3.101] (jaguar.aps.org [149.28.3.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by newman.ridge.aps.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1ILnwMf011317 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:49:59 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <9975416e2ef6f29c2813c05c6612f749@aps.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Paul Dlug Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:49:55 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) Subject: re: 5.3 on IBM/Intel Blade server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:49:58 -0000 Just a follow up to my message from the other week, it looks like we are experiencing the same problem as described in this PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=68445 Only the suggested "fix" in the PR doesn't work for me. Does anyone have more information on this issue? The PR is still open. Thanks, Paul