From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat Mar 29 14:01:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA15978 for emulation-outgoing; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 14:01:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.75]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA15973 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 14:01:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from unalmodem.usc.unal.edu.co (unalmodem00.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.30]) by apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA10357; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 17:03:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <333DBAA4.7BD8@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 16:58:12 -0800 From: Pedro Giffuni X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Mini CC: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Latest doscmd report References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jonathan Mini wrote: > > I would like to say that DosCMD doesn't emulate an XT, it emulates real > mode. Which means that it works jsut like an i386 or i486 in vm86 mode. > The difference is a _big_ deal. You get 32-bit registers for math, and a > whoel load of other extremely useful goodies. > Ah.. that explains why DOSEMU users have to get some OS2 stuff in order to run windows 3.1 ...they have to run it in protected mode. (I have to read some intel.com docs). --Pedro > > Jonathan Mini (j_mini@efn.org) > > ... bleakness ... desolation ... plastic forks ...