From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 11 08:32:33 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C040E16A41F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 08:32:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk (pfepa.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.235])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F2243D45
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 08:32:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (0x50a6a4ba.naenxx7.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk
	[80.166.164.186])
	by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C621647FE48;
	Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:32:27 +0200 (CEST)
To: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:04:08 +0200."
	<20050911080408.GA46725@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> 
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:32:27 +0200
Message-ID: <1348.1126427547@phk.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@phk.freebsd.dk
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: comms/ltmdm and COMPAT_43 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 08:32:33 -0000

In message <20050911080408.GA46725@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>, Divacky Roman writes:

>> Most of our tty stuff depends on COMPAT_43
>
>what of the tty stuff depends on COMPAT_43? I found some ioctls and then
>nothing.. 

It is only the ioctls, but there are several hundred ports which break
if we don't support then.

On my todo list, the tty parts of COMPAT_43 becomes standard (for that
reason) and the rest of COMPAT_43 can then become optional.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.