From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Dec 7 0:52:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from winston.freebsd.org (adsl-64-173-15-98.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.173.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904BC37B417; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 00:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.freebsd.org (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB78qMq39096; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 00:52:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.freebsd.org) To: Sean Chittenden Cc: Alfred Perlstein , arch@FreeBSD.ORG, tobez@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Perl 5.6.1 in the base.... In-Reply-To: Message from Sean Chittenden of "Thu, 06 Dec 2001 16:29:43 PST." <20011206162943.A74937@ninja1.internal> Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 00:52:22 -0800 Message-ID: <39092.1007715142@winston.freebsd.org> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I don't recall seeing anything to the effect of "death before 5.6", and any complaints about backwards-compatibility pretty much expired a year or so ago, as you've already noted, so I'd say it's just resource constrained at this point. I also don't think it needs to become a core issue unless -arch devolves into flames over it or something, an event I don't see happening. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message