From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 12 22:17:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C7D37C1D9; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 22:17:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA56927; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:17:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA21167; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:17:29 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200007130517.XAA21167@harmony.village.org> To: Greg Lehey Subject: Re: HEADS UP! Always use the 'make buildkernel' target to make yer kernels Cc: Kris Kennaway , Brad Knowles , stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 12 Jul 2000 12:49:56 +0930." <20000712124955.K30262@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20000712124955.K30262@wantadilla.lemis.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:17:29 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000712124955.K30262@wantadilla.lemis.com> Greg Lehey writes: : I'd *far* prefer to get both methods into line with each other so that : it doesn't make any difference whether you do a 'make buildkernel' in : /usr/src or a 'make all' in /usr/src/sys/compile/FOO. I'd prefer it too. However, there are times when one MUST use buildkernel. One can generally get away with the old method, but sometimes the tools change and there's no way around it. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message