Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:25:06 +0200 From: bjoern koenig <abfalltonne@alpha-tierchen.de> To: muc-lists-freebsd-chat@moderators.muc.de Subject: Re: OT: Beastie makes a cameo appearance on apple.com. Message-ID: <2kil5gF2q6tlU1@uni-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <20040630154000.S26326@wonkity.com> References: <A2A28DB6D52E084783ACD6E6C6F5D79001F3A81B@EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com> <Pine.OSX.4.58.0406281339040.13395@onorysvfu.chefhrq-jvgu.arg> <20040630154000.S26326@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warren Block wrote: > But what about Mach? Did they just throw it out because 5.x offered > everything they needed? FreeBSD elements were always components of Mac OS X, even a lot of latest 4.x versions. So Apple wrote "The upgraded kernel, based on FreeBSD 5.x, [...]", not that they replaced their old mach kernel. And this is yet another nice line with exactly sixtysix characters Bjoern
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2kil5gF2q6tlU1>