From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Aug 24 1:34:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C5037B400 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 01:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.isigreensboro.org (gso31-124-152.triad.rr.com [24.31.124.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0B2E43E65 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 01:34:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from justin@isigreensboro.org) Received: (qmail 58330 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2002 08:35:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Justin-Mitchells-Computer.local.) (192.168.1.10) by 192.168.1.2 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2002 08:35:55 -0000 Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 04:34:53 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: linux_base vs linux_base-6 From: Justin Mitchell To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <5CA179A4-B73C-11D6-80FA-0003937F5D60@isigreensboro.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hiya. I noticed that linux_base-6 is the default installation for linux emulation, and I was just curious what the advantages to using it over linux_base were (being that linux_base is more likely to work with newer apps). Speed is a huge concern to me for this server, which has to run a very cpu intensive application in linux emulation, so that's why I ask. Thanks, Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message