From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 20 16:40:04 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 638B416A4CE; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:40:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com
	[81.103.67.204])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D977743D48; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:40:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net)
Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.43
	(FreeBSD))	id 1CKJVK-0009cJ-Bm; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:40:02 +0100
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:40:02 +0100
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20041020164002.GH57641@submonkey.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>,
	Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>,
	jamie rishaw at google mail <mitigator@gmail.com>,
	Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org,
	arch@freebsd.org
References: <41767CF1.2020005@FreeBSD.org>
	<6ff30abd04102008163115a32d@mail.gmail.com> <41769194.4060809@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WVXhfWX7iGQecmy9"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <41769194.4060809@freebsd.org>
X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net>
cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>
cc: jamie rishaw at google mail <mitigator@gmail.com>
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped
	/kernel ?]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:40:04 -0000


--WVXhfWX7iGQecmy9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 10:25:56AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> jamie rishaw at google mail wrote:
> >What are the performance implications of a debug kernel?
> >
> >Disk space really shouldnt even be an issue.. if it is, and its down
> >to the difference of 20 megs, well, duno. 512 meg CF's going for
> >sub-$50 .. the only reason i could see even a debate would be any
> >significant performance hits..
>=20
> Disk space on the release CD images is at a premium, and putting debug
> kernels on there generally consumes 10-15MB that could be used by
> packages.

Would you consider this something that we could run with in
CURRENT/STABLE and just turn off for releases?

Ceri
--=20

--WVXhfWX7iGQecmy9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBdpThocfcwTS3JF8RAhszAKCt3IIBzvTgubjV2/OTw7WgPd93VwCfRviL
BiwsfLEtnrfWjeC03RQRQPs=
=BX1P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--WVXhfWX7iGQecmy9--