Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:50:31 GMT
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: kern/63837: [patch] USB: hid_is_collection() only looks for the first item
Message-ID:  <200411171950.iAHJoVNK059165@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/63837; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To: nivit@email.it (Nicola Vitale)
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/63837: [patch] USB: hid_is_collection() only looks for the first item
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:25:55 -0500

 On Wednesday 17 November 2004 11:11 am, Nicola Vitale wrote:
 > Hello,
 >
 > > [John Baldwin, 2004-11-17T09:59:20-05::00]
 > > So, I think that the first part of the patch (setting h.report_ID to
 > > zero) is not needed.  Basically, AFAICT, the effect of the patch is that
 > > hid_report_size() will now return the ID of the first device of a given
 > > kind rather than the last such device.
 >
 > I'm agree with you. But I can't understand how this patch to
 > hid_report_size() can magically eliminate the bug in hid_is_collection(),
 > which this PR originally referred to.
 > The function hid_is_collection() never calls hid_report_size()
 > directly or indirectly.
 
 I think it affects the IDs that other drivers use (see uhid.c for example) and 
 thus they use a "more correct" ID.
 
 -- 
 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
 "Power Users Use the Power to Serve"  =  http://www.FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411171950.iAHJoVNK059165>