From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 31 16:58:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07D516A421 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 16:58:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EAF13C455 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 16:58:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920) id 99CB01A4D81; Thu, 31 May 2007 09:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 18:36:43 +0200 From: Maxime Henrion To: Balwinder S Dheeman Message-ID: <20070531163643.GU54713@elvis.mu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] The current csup sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:58:40 -0000 Balwinder S Dheeman wrote: > Hi, > > I think, the manpage /usr/src/contrib/csup/csup.1 is dated and, or have not > been updated per current csup sources. I don't quite understand this statement. Unless I have missed something, the current csup manual page matches the code and thus seems up-to-date to me. You are talking about updating the manual page but your config.c patch actually changes a few default settings and modifies the manual page accordingly. To pick one example, you are changing the default base directory from /usr/local/etc/cvsup to /var/db. This seems to indicate you somehow confused the default FreeBSD settings with the default csup settings. It's true that we changed the default FreeBSD supfiles to use /var/db instead of /usr for the default base directory, but this has nothing to do with the default csup settings. I see no reason to change the default csup settings; it would just break the supfiles for people who use the default settings. So, it would be a POLA violation. It would also break compatibility with CVSup since it would still use the old defaults. Cheers, Maxime