From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul  2 18:24:30 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142271065778;
	Sat,  2 Jul 2011 18:24:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dima_bsd@inbox.lv)
Received: from mgw1.apollo.lv (mgw1.apollo.lv [80.232.168.216])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60248FC17;
	Sat,  2 Jul 2011 18:24:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [46.109.212.104] (unknown [46.109.212.104])
	by mgw1.apollo.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5893DF89F;
	Sat,  2 Jul 2011 21:07:20 +0300 (EEST)
From: Dmitriy Demidov <dima_bsd@inbox.lv>
To: ae@FreeBSD.org,
 freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 18:07:18 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <201107021807.18663.dima_bsd@inbox.lv>
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/144187: [ipfw] deadlock using multiple ipfw nat and
	multiple limit statements
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:24:30 -0000

> Synopsis: [ipfw] deadlock using multiple ipfw nat and multiple limit
> statements State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: ae
> State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 28 05:29:45 UTC 2011
> State-Changed-Why:
> Can you still reproduce this on a supported release?
> Or maybe you can test your rules on head/ branch?
> There were some changes related to ipfw_nat.
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144187

Hello,

I have retested this configuration on today's build of FreeBSD 9-CURRENT i386. 
It seems that this problem is soved now! I am unable to reproduce deadlock 
anymore. All is working just fine.

Thanks!