From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 19 11:21:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E9C16A400; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from proof.pobox.com (proof.pobox.com [207.106.133.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE52043D45; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:21:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from proof (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by proof.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F07F2E0A; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:21:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mappit.local.linnet.org (212-74-113-67.static.dsl.as9105.com [212.74.113.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by proof.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886453E1E8; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:21:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists by mappit.local.linnet.org with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FWAkU-0001zE-1J; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:21:30 +0100 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:21:30 +0100 From: Brian Candler To: Sten Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8rsdal?= Message-ID: <20060419112130.GE7542@uk.tiscali.com> References: <200604142048.20189.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20060414140709.20c51ebc@localhost> <200604151053.25089.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20060415115352.1ef82bb1@localhost> <20060415195147.GA54638@heff.fud.org.nz> <20060415232801.0dbbc8f4@localhost> <4444CA13.8000405@wm-access.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4444CA13.8000405@wm-access.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Andrew Thompson , Fabian Keil Subject: Re: How to use if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:21:36 -0000 On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 01:14:27PM +0200, Sten Daniel Srsdal wrote: > hostap should work, ad-hoc should work. by infrastructure you mean that > the card operates as a 'station'? then it shouldn't work (correctly) as > defined by the standard. commercial products tend to implement "mac-nat" I've seen this; a 'wireless bridge' is actually a masquerading router. See http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=5105 for some ARP and tcpdump capture which shows the device actually mangling the ARP responses. It does seem to work though (as long as you only want to bridge IP datagrams)