From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 9 12:07:11 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA04678 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 9 May 1996 12:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay-4.mail.demon.net (relay-4.mail.demon.net [158.152.1.108]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA04666 for ; Thu, 9 May 1996 12:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from post.demon.co.uk ([158.152.1.72]) by relay-4.mail.demon.net id ae10541; 9 May 96 19:06 GMT Received: from jraynard.demon.co.uk ([158.152.42.77]) by relay-3.mail.demon.net id aa00249; 9 May 96 19:59 +0100 Received: (from fqueries@localhost) by jraynard.demon.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) id BAA06305; Thu, 9 May 1996 01:03:10 GMT Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 01:03:10 GMT From: James Raynard Message-Id: <199605090103.BAA06305@jraynard.demon.co.uk> To: cove@nbn.com CC: questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199605081845.LAA26646@brazil.nbn.com> (message from Cove Schneider on Wed, 8 May 1996 11:45:01 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: inn & mmap Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>>>> Cove Schneider writes: > > Has any one run into any problems with inn using mmap under 2.1? Apparently there is a problem with mmap and inn on 2.1. The workaround is - don't use mmap. Fortunately FreeBSD's VM system is very good, so it won't cause much of a performance hit if you don't use mmap.