From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 20 14:37:39 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C111065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA258FC1D
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:37:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5KEbW3q001483;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:37:32 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5KEbWlM001480; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:37:32 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:37:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
In-Reply-To: <201206201348.q5KDm2u3045621@fire.js.berklix.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201636090.1476@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <201206201348.q5KDm2u3045621@fire.js.berklix.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:37:32 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why Clang 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:37:39 -0000

>
> They could be reduced by a combo. of eg:
> 	- forcible unsub, & black list,
> 	- block of anon. remailer domains
> 	- making this list "subscribtion required before posting".
> 		(which would make it harder for newbies fresh to
> 		FreeBSD, but we need some solution)
>
> I suggest others too should complain to <postmaster@freebsd.org>
> appending offenders bad postings, & let postmaster decide action.
>
> The only other option I can think of is to personaly extend my
> procmail filter on my own questions@ incoming stream, to delete all
> postings from listed individuals.
> 	Many others could do similar, but massive inefficiency, &
> 	newbies couldn't, & the noise on the raw unfiltered list &
> 	in web achives would damage FreeBSD.
>
while subscription is good idea, as well as your personal blacklist, your 
other proposition would require strict political compatibility with those 
who would decide about who cannot post.