Date: 11 Jun 2001 23:29:42 EST From: "Mark Sergeant" <msergeant@snsonline.net> To: "Ilya" <mail@krel.org>, "Mark Hughes" <mark@dvdnews.co.uk>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: lan speed Message-ID: <200106120429.f5C4ThX01135@xyzzy.intranet.snsonline.net> In-Reply-To: <001601c0f2f4$f2e379b0$0100a8c0@ilya> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106102120590.37575-100000@musicman.com> <005f01c0f216$2d0553a0$0100a8c0@ilya> <03a201c0f21a$33bd0130$0200a8c0@mark2> <001601c0f2f4$f2e379b0$0100a8c0@ilya>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
reason for scp's slowness is cpu over head you may want to try scp -c blowfish to improve scp speeds. And yes 1mb/s is standard for 10baseT Cheers, Mark On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:05:42 -0400, Ilya said: > here is what happens: > I did some testing with various combinations of settings and got very > interesting results: > win lap to desktop (with matronix card) 10/h 160kb > windows laptop to windows desktop (Intel ether expr pro) at 10/h 900kb/s > > so I switched desktop card, than I switched bsd card (from 3com 905c to > Intel) , got lots of increase again. but unstable, than switched 8 port 3com > 10/100 hub with a 5 port old lynksys 10mb hub, and got stable 900kb-1mb > performance on all boxes. So it actually boils down to hardware ;) > > the only problem I have now is that scp is still at 200-500kb, while ftp is > solid 1mb, any explanation for that one? > > thank you for your help. > > > PS is 1mb/s what am supposed to get from 10baseT network cards/hubs? > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > -- Mark Sergeant Unix Systems Administrator Fortune follows... Reality is for people who lack imagination. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106120429.f5C4ThX01135>