From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 10 15:22:20 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02510DC5
 for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:22:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22d.google.com (mail-qc0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22d])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B84011FF3
 for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:22:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r5so4431527qcx.4
 for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=/GGrOE5CDh816DFPbcT2o8hpVaF+P3PCFyHQtW/M9pk=;
 b=SQve7aRUPiWLGw21B2eo2gcLjdwyp6T/GXb6YWETPcB3Y+Bx3TQ6lCLEMbWyW9t72X
 Yx09OPdhK8/OF/iIlmBU3Bu4t5F5Z+n5ZAvVX0vp/kt7FstRP+V2wfMcX/xHiB3y/DDi
 V7QARPFETXHUi1ZQlgPhr9lYjtePTbUpDsOeONVilEWjm8XJbkKCGRTlBgTVGSYeU6L6
 rGmuqByCu+sEx/U+mMddmWF+zGZtJOF1N45m6pvt/pDzNc71aWhQBOGchd3nq7TM37N/
 FX/x9y30DeLpTTNBpC6rMCXCdDMZ5DKrrTh27zRMzaawkAwNvQjp0ReKQYNKeCNhVUPL
 H+JA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.115.3 with SMTP id g3mr11559621qaq.19.1397143338905;
 Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: carpeddiem@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.88.105 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <86eh15usv2.fsf@nine.des.no>
References: <86eh15usv2.fsf@nine.des.no>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:22:18 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: KnxGxi_D-pfi4SWsHlEi33kxU9o
Message-ID: <CAPyFy2Ct-GJOy=x2ZwXQJnZdf0BbGm7VmTQcqc1U9Zxzkx7YQg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ar and ranlib -D
From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <arch@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:22:20 -0000

On 10 April 2014 11:06, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
> The attached patch adds -D to ARFLAGS and introduces RANLIBFLAGS which
> defaults to -D.  This ensures that all timestamps inside static
> libraries in the base system are hardcoded to 0 (aka the epoch), which
> is a huge step towards fully reproducible builds.  Any objections?

Looks good to me, I'm not sure why this didn't happen long ago.