From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Sat Aug  8 15:20:14 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E561B9B6D7F
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat,  8 Aug 2015 15:20:13 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from phillip.a.minimi@lmco.com)
Received: from mailfo01.lmco.com (mailfo01.lmco.com [192.31.106.12])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mailfo01.lmco.com",
 Issuer "Symantec Class 3 Secure Server CA - G4" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0F21116B
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat,  8 Aug 2015 15:20:12 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from phillip.a.minimi@lmco.com)
Received: from HVXHTPN9.us.lmco.com (hvxhtpn9.ems.lmco.com [158.186.149.27])
 by mailfo01.lmco.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t78FK9Rc021673
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:20:09 +0100
Received: from HVXDSP41.us.lmco.com ([fe80::f842:f7dd:ab78:45f6]) by
 HVXHTPN9.us.lmco.com ([fe80::cc0f:96a:cb16:8684%15]) with mapi id
 14.03.0174.001; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 11:20:09 -0400
From: "Minimi, Phillip A" <phillip.a.minimi@lmco.com>
To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: coretemp driver
Thread-Topic: coretemp driver
Thread-Index: AdDR7WVzdkHSiaG6TQKTPe78S1XBPw==
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 15:20:09 +0000
Message-ID: <830397DA32E1A0479077F4D3642B448B62D86EC3@HVXDSP41.us.lmco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [158.186.156.91]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-LM-Outbound: External 158.186.149.27 cntry=us
 g=cd7f0d7ab3e8950051413646d21d3ddc q=t78FK9Rc021673 m=1
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151, 1.0.33,
 0.0.0000
 definitions=2015-08-08_03:2015-08-07,2015-08-08,1970-01-01 signatures=0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:20:14 -0000

We are running RedHawk5.4.11, 2.6.31.13, based on RHEL5.4 x86, on an IBM HS=
23. Executing sensors showed no output at all, no sensors detected. I looke=
d at coretemp.c and saw that the HS23 CPU, 32nm, CPUID=3D 0X2D, was not sup=
ported and in fact coretemp was reporting that in /var/log/messages. I adde=
d 0x2D to coretemp.c and rebuilt the kernel to see if we could even read a =
sensor. That worked and now there is a temperature reported for each CPU. H=
owever, with the "workaround" I don't have any confidence in the accuracy o=
f the output of course. Is there a patch I can apply to the kernel source t=
hat will update coretemp.c and related source code?