Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 12:54:27 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> To: =?iso-8859-5?B?u9Xe3djUIL3V0tXn1eDv?= <leonid.nevecherya@port-ac.ru> Cc: khera@kciLink.com Subject: Re: Please, update ports/mail/postfix Message-ID: <m3hdrosazg.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20040730061131.D399F43D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> =?iso-8859-5?B?KLvV3t3Y1CC91dLV59Xg7ydz?= message of "Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:03:26 %2B0400") References: <20040730061131.D399F43D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=BB=D5=DE=DD=D8=D4 =BD=D5=D2=D5=E7=D5=E0=EF <leonid.nevecherya@port-ac.ru> = writes: > Please add to ports/mail/postfix port support of postfix VDA patch. This = is > good patch, which add Mailbox / Maildir size limit, known also as "soft > quota", to avoid user take all you disk space. >=20=20 > I am speak English very bad, but I hope you have understood me=20 Leonid, Wietse, the Postfix maintainer, isn't very fond of such "soft quota" games. Besides, there is already a "maildrop" port, and maildrop can use soft quota. What advantage does VDA have over using the maildrop port? Thanks, --=20 Matthias Andree Encrypted mail welcome: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 (PGP/MIME preferred)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3hdrosazg.fsf>